<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for BarackObamaEtc.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barackobamaetc.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barackobamaetc.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 22:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Barack Obama a Candidate for Christians by pligg.com</title>
		<link>http://www.barackobamaetc.com/barack-obama-a-candidate-for-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>pligg.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 22:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barackobamaetc.com/barack-obama-a-candidate-for-christians/#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Barack Obama a Candidate for Christians...&lt;/strong&gt;

First let me begin this article by stating that I understand the sentiment to have an African-American president. Although you couldn&#039;t tell it from my...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Barack Obama a Candidate for Christians&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>First let me begin this article by stating that I understand the sentiment to have an African-American president. Although you couldn&#8217;t tell it from my&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Vs. Constitution (60 Sec. TV Ad) by alequa10</title>
		<link>http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>alequa10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/#comment-560</guid>
		<description>In short, the Case whereby a Environmentalist group blocked a Bill, claiming although no current injury for standing can be provided, but a future injury may acure whereby emotional distraught, Animal migrations MIGHT change, breathing air MIGHT be different, ect whereby that group was granted Standing based on a possible future event  yet to happen.  Berg is using this standing clause as the same.  So it really is a 50/50.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In short, the Case whereby a Environmentalist group blocked a Bill, claiming although no current injury for standing can be provided, but a future injury may acure whereby emotional distraught, Animal migrations MIGHT change, breathing air MIGHT be different, ect whereby that group was granted Standing based on a possible future event  yet to happen.  Berg is using this standing clause as the same.  So it really is a 50/50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Vs. Constitution (60 Sec. TV Ad) by alequa10</title>
		<link>http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>alequa10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/#comment-559</guid>
		<description>Not to interrupt your prior conversations, however, you mentioned whereby there was verification of BHO BC. This is highly untrue to a point. Yes, Hawaii officials did state in contrast to his COLB that they did have a BC, verbally, and when asked what birth place did it state (remember law at that time allowing up to 12 months of allocation) where that birth claims on the BC, they refused to answer that, claiming We Cannot give that information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to interrupt your prior conversations, however, you mentioned whereby there was verification of BHO BC. This is highly untrue to a point. Yes, Hawaii officials did state in contrast to his COLB that they did have a BC, verbally, and when asked what birth place did it state (remember law at that time allowing up to 12 months of allocation) where that birth claims on the BC, they refused to answer that, claiming We Cannot give that information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Vs. Constitution (60 Sec. TV Ad) by AMERlCALOVESHEROS</title>
		<link>http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>AMERlCALOVESHEROS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/#comment-558</guid>
		<description>Behold the &quot;birther&quot; movement.

Like the bowel movement, the birther movement&#039;s outcome is the same old crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behold the &#8220;birther&#8221; movement.</p>
<p>Like the bowel movement, the birther movement&#8217;s outcome is the same old crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Vs. Constitution (60 Sec. TV Ad) by EdyKelDev</title>
		<link>http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>EdyKelDev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/#comment-557</guid>
		<description>They knew what the case was about, and they implied that he was born in the state of Hawaii by verifying the information on his BC. They never refused anything, because they gave an affidavit to the court along with his BC. Also, it would have been stated on his BC if he was born outside of Hawaii. His BC states: 

City, town, location of birth: Honolulu

Island of Birth: OAHU

County of Birth: Honolulu

If he was born in some other country, this information would reflect that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They knew what the case was about, and they implied that he was born in the state of Hawaii by verifying the information on his BC. They never refused anything, because they gave an affidavit to the court along with his BC. Also, it would have been stated on his BC if he was born outside of Hawaii. His BC states: </p>
<p>City, town, location of birth: Honolulu</p>
<p>Island of Birth: OAHU</p>
<p>County of Birth: Honolulu</p>
<p>If he was born in some other country, this information would reflect that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Vs. Constitution (60 Sec. TV Ad) by stereofreak1</title>
		<link>http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>stereofreak1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/#comment-556</guid>
		<description>You didn&#039;t answer my question. What makes you think you&#039;re smarter than them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#8217;t answer my question. What makes you think you&#8217;re smarter than them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Vs. Constitution (60 Sec. TV Ad) by stereofreak1</title>
		<link>http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>stereofreak1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/#comment-555</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, and I&#039;m sure a 361,276 lb plane flying into a building at high speeds taking out the center supports wouldn&#039;t bring it down? Go research it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, and I&#8217;m sure a 361,276 lb plane flying into a building at high speeds taking out the center supports wouldn&#8217;t bring it down? Go research it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Vs. Constitution (60 Sec. TV Ad) by tsenzei</title>
		<link>http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>tsenzei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barackobamaetc.com/obama-vs-constitution-60-sec-tv-ad/#comment-554</guid>
		<description>1. That&#039;s pretty light compared to the weight and mass of the building.

2. It didn&#039;t take out any of the center supports.

3. The building was engineered to withstand such an impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. That&#8217;s pretty light compared to the weight and mass of the building.</p>
<p>2. It didn&#8217;t take out any of the center supports.</p>
<p>3. The building was engineered to withstand such an impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
